PENDEKATAN INTEGRATIF UNTUK MERANCANG KURIKULUM MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH

Nazaruddin Ali Basyah

doi:10.59755/alhisab.v1i1.64

Nazaruddin Ali Basyah Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59755/alhisab.v1i1.64

Keywords: Designing, Principles, Teaching, Economic, High School

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Education has an important and effective role in the development of a nation. Various studies in many countries have found the strength of the relationship between education and the level of development of these nations. This strong relationship is shown by various economic and socio-cultural indicators. Education that has the ability to facilitate change is education of quality, and relevant to the needs of the entire community. To accelerate the improvement of student achievement in an effective, continuous and comprehensive manner, the government should not only focus on physical development alone but need to focus more on aspects that have a big impact on student achievement such as teacher quality, teaching methods and leadership in schools. The weakness of students is in applying theory to solving economic problems in the questions asked during the (national exam). Students cannot relate economic concepts and theories to the questions being asked. Students are also very weak in answering questions on the microeconomic and macroeconomic sections which contain a combination of economic concepts and mathematical formulas. A teaching method that can assist and encourage students in understanding economic concepts is indispensable.

ABSTRAK

Pendidikan mempunyai peranan penting dan efektif dalam pembangunan suatu bangsa. Berbagai kajian di banyak Negara mendapati kekuatan hubungan antara pendidikan dengan tingkat pembangunan bangsa-bangsa tersebut. Hubungan yang kuat itu ditunjukkan oleh berbagai indikator ekonomi dan sosial-budaya. Pendidikan yang mempunyai kemampuan memfasilitasi perubahan adalah pendidikan yang berkualitas, dan relevan dengan keperluan seluruh masyarakatnya. Untuk mempercepat perbaikan prestasi pelajar secara efektif, terus menerus dan menyeluruh, pemerintah tidak boleh hanya memberi fokus kepada pembangunan fisik semata-mata tetapi perlu lebih memberikan fokus kepada aspek yang memberi impak besar kepada prestasi pelajar seperti kualitas guru, metode pengajaran dan kepemimpinan di sekolah. Kelemahan pelajar yaitu di dalam pengaplikasian teori bagi penyelesaian masalah ekonomi di dalam soal yang ditanya semasa (ujian nasional). Pelajar tidak dapat mengaitkan konsep dan teori ekonomi dengan soal yang ditanyakan. Para pelajar juga amat lemah di dalam menjawab soal bahagian mikro ekonomi dan makro ekonomi yang mengandung gabungan antara konsep ekonomi dan rumus matematik. Satu metode pengajaran yang boleh membantu dan mendorong para pelajar di dalam memahami konsep-konsep ekonomi sangat diperlukan.

Kata Kunci: Perancangan, Prinsip, Pengajaran, Ekonomi, Sekolah Menengah Atas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aladejana, F. & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science laboratory environment and academic performance. Journal Science Educational Technology 16: 500-506.

Berková, K., Krejčová, K., & Novák, J. (2020). Students’ attitudes to selected subjects in secondary economic education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 9-23.

Briggs, S.A. (1994). Counseling student through their individual learning. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Case, Karl E. & Ray C Fair, 2007. Principles of Economics, Eight Edition, Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Davis, C. and Wilcock, E., 2005. Developing, implementing and evaluating case studies in materials science. Eur. J. Engng Edu. 30, 59 69.

Deliarnov. 1995. Perkembangan Pemikiran Ekonomi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Depdikbud, R. I. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan No. 64 sd n0. 70 tahun 2013, tentang Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Depdikbud RI.

Dunn, R. dan Dunn, K. (2008). Learning Style Inventory Development and Research: Reston, Virginia : Reston Publishing.

Johnston, C. G., James, R. H., Lye, J. N., & McDonald, I. M. (2000). An evaluation of collaborative problem solving for learning economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 13-29.

Gwartney, James D., Richard L. Stroup, Russel S. Sobel, David Macpherson. 2003. Macroeconomics, Private and Public Choice. Tenth Edition, Thomson, South Western.

Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational technology research and development, 40(3), 21-38.

Othman Al-Habshi. (2000). Cadangan penstrukturan semula sistem pendidikan kepada P-12: Rasional dan struktur alternatif. Penilaian kertas kerja yang dibentang dalam Seminar Penstrukturan semula Sistem Pendidikan Kebangsaan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Selangor.

Lenie Kneppers, Carla van Boxtel and Bernadette van Hout-Wolters. (2012). The Road to Transfer : Concept and Context Approaches to the Subject of Economics in Secondary School. International Review of Economics Education. 11, 36–56.

Larry, King,. Gilbert, Bill. 2004. Seni berbicara, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Maria Chong Abdullah et al. (2011). Strategi Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi: Satu Anjakan Paradigma. Malaysian Education Deans Council Journal 8 : 102-103.

Mohd. Kamal Hassan. (2000). Cadangan penstrukturan semula sistem pendidikan kepada P-12: Rasional dan struktur alternatif. Penilaian kertas kerja yang dibentang dalam Seminar Penstrukturan semula Sistem Pendidikan Kebangsaan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Selangor.

Mankiw, Gregory N., 2000. Macroeconomics, 4th Edition, First Publisher, Inc. New York.

Parkin, Michael, 2005. Macroeconomics, seventh edition, International Edition, Pearson Education, Inc. New York.

Russel, J.D. (1974). Modular instruction : A guide to design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular materials. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Company.

Saedah Siraj. (2004). Preferen pelajar terhadap teknik pengajaran guru. Jurnal Pendidikan 24: 93-112.

Samuelson. P.A. 1985. Economics: An Introduction Analysis. Tokyo: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Schuhmann, P. W., Mc Goldrick, K., & Burrus, R. T. (2005). Student quantitative literacy: importance, measurement, and correlation with economic literacy. The American Economist, 49-65.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. 2005. Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Siegfried, J. J., Saunders, P., Stinar, E., & Zhang, H. (1996). Teaching tools: How is introductory economics taught in America?. Economic Inquiry, 34(1), 182-192.

Suyanto. 2009. Pokok-pokok Pembelajaran Pendidikan Ekonomi. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Todaro, Michael P. 2001. Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga, Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.